Taslima Nasree continues her crusade to turn the freethoughtblogs into an anti-porn propaganda rag with her latest installment on the sex industry “Let’s Eroticize Equality.” This piece is complete with all the usual assertions about pornography and it’s alleged “effects” on society with none of the empty calories that come from PROOF!
She misleadingly opens her piece with the line,
I am against pornography because it has many harmful effects, encouragement of sex trafficking, desensitization, pedophilia, dehumanization, sexual exploitation, sexual dysfunction, inability to maintain healthy sexual relationships.
I say misleading because you would think after a statement like this she would proceed to prove her assertions with solid evidence. The freethoughtblogs is supposed to be a blogging site for freethinkers and SKEPTICS…isn’t it? Maybe Ms. Nasree is simply confused. Allow me to point out the definition of the word “skeptic” for her:
Skeptic
1.a person who questions the validity or authenticity of something purporting to be factual.2.a person who maintains a doubting attitude, as toward values, plans, statements, or the character of others.3.a person who doubts the truth of a religion, especially Christianity, or of important elements of it.
Pornography is exclusively for men’s pleasure. Women are used as sex objects. I know some women will say, ‘we love to be sex objects’. Millions of misogynists are out there to support the idea of the objectification of women. I do not have to support this.
I am living proof of the flaw in her claim that, “Pornography is exclusively for men’s pleasure.” I am a woman and I enjoy some porn.
Notice how she poisons the well against any woman in porn who may disagree with her in statement, “I know some women will say, ‘we love to be sex objects’.” REALLY Tas? (I would say Ms. Nasreen but with her blatant disrespect of the women in the sex industry she is making it clear that she neither gives respect to nor expects respect from the sex workers she claims she wants to help.) My guess is that women in the sex industry would have a number of issues with your assertions but to you all it comes down to is that they “love to be sex objects” right? No sex worker could possibly be SKEPTICAL of your claims. NOOOOOOO….! Skepticism is for smart people ISN’T , right TAZ?
“Millions of misogynists are out there to support the idea of the objectification of women.” Oh, I get it. ANY woman who disagrees with your assertion that porn is exclusively for men simply HATES women. As if this isn’t the most tired and over used tactic employed by “antis” such as you. You make and unsupported blanket statement and anyone who doesn’t agree with you is a “misogynist.” People like you use this bullshit tactic so much that the word “misogynist” seems to lose it’s meaning as if that is helpful to women.
And how does she wrap this up into a nice neat bow? “I do not have to support this.” You hear that out there in skeptic land? Taz is better then you and she does not HAVE TO support her claims. Who do any of you think you are to actually expect her to support what she is claiming. You just shut up and nod your head when Mz. Taz tell u what to think, k.
She continues to go on to argue some false dichotomy between pornography and erotica as if there is no grey area in between. All in all, it’s simply her saying “this is what I don’t find offensive and acceptable and if you don’t agree with me you like being an object or you just hate women blah blah blah…”
She also throws around statements like, “Gloria Steinem says…” as if just because St. Steinem says it it must be true. And, “researchers say” without linking to the research. She does link to some opinion pieces complete with the anecdotal evidence that may fool a non-skeptic but by this point she’s just not even trying.
Of course she fails to even mention the porn sites that cater to the more romantic (yet equally explicit 🙂 ) like New Sensations Romance or The Porn for Women. She closes it out with “Leave it. Let’s listen to a song “ where she links to some kumbaya song undoubtedly to make appeals to the emotions of the masses complete.
Did you see Richard Carrier’s write up on this? He was really good.
She’s basically displaying acting like someone who’s never seen a healthy attitude toward sex and assumes no one else has either.
YAY! MY FIRST COMMENTER! Oh that’s right. I should link his piece here. Thanks for reminding me. @~>~~
That first quote is a whopper. How does porn encourage sex trafficking. It’s a bunch of hoodoo voodoo. I’d like my skepticism sans radical ideology, thanks very much. This is getting interesting to me. Good post!
If I remember my radfem ideology correctly, the vast majority of the women in porn are trafficked sex slaves. Basically, anyone who isn’t a verifiable star is probably forced into it.
Also, porn makes men want sex, so then they go out and try to convince women to have it with them, which is awful.
You should see a video by FeministWhore on the “science” they use to defend this stuff. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6To6YEfWqME&feature=youtu.be
I remember laughing with her as we were looking at some of this stuff. I think you’ll enjoy it and she probably links the pdf under her video. 😉
So Porn Harms is the Answer in Genesis of sexual sociology? Sounds about right.
EXACTLY! Why is it when it comes to sex some people’s ratioinal thought turns completely off =/
You shoulda seen how she started off that post before she edited it. Originally she started off by basically comparing those who disagree with her to murderers. “Should we fight for murderers just because they are atheist” or some such nonsense like that.
Ya know, for an atheist she sure does treat that anti-sex industry stuff like a religion.
Good catch! You’re everywhere!
(everywhere but in my skype, beotch) 😦
Taslima uses atheism the way Gail Dines uses feminism and Marxism…as mere tools for her essential sexual fascism.
What I find interesting and ironic is that a woman claiming to be a “victim” of religion is dong her exile in Indonesia…not exactly a secular country. Not to mention, the perfect hypocritic mix of sexual fundamentalism and having one of the most active underground sex trafficking trades around.
But of course, it’s Westerners who are so “elitist”. Really.
Anthony
Pingback: Week Of The Anti-Porn Crazaa, Part 3: Taslima Nasreen Puts The “Taz” In Anti-Sex Work/Anti-Porn Hysteria | Red Garter Club Blog (Version 3.2)
Ahem, a-hem, a-hem….
Week Of The AntiPorn Crazaa, Part 3: Taslima Nasreen Puts The Taz In Anti-SexWork/AntiPorn Hysteria (The Red Garter Club Blog – Ver. 3.2)
Anthony
Thank you for the mention luv.